![Measuring a tad bigger then the baby was suppose to be lol. This was around 9 weeks 6 days I believe if I remember correctly. Can't wait to get another ultrasound picture!<3 - Measuring a tad bigger then the baby was suppose to be lol. This was around 9 weeks 6 days I believe if I remember correctly. Can't wait to get another ultrasound picture!<3 -](https://asset-cf-cdn.glowing.com/forum/ddeb510b853fc98dd5bf2bb5a1085490.jpg)
Measuring a tad bigger then the baby was suppose to be lol. This was around 9 weeks 6 days I believe if I remember correctly. Can't wait to get another ultrasound picture!<3 -
![Early pregnancy ultrasound measurements and prediction of first trimester pregnancy loss: A logistic model | Scientific Reports Early pregnancy ultrasound measurements and prediction of first trimester pregnancy loss: A logistic model | Scientific Reports](https://media.springernature.com/m685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41598-020-58114-3/MediaObjects/41598_2020_58114_Fig1_HTML.png)
Early pregnancy ultrasound measurements and prediction of first trimester pregnancy loss: A logistic model | Scientific Reports
Prenatal ultrasound at 9 weeks of gestation shows a huge complex cystic... | Download Scientific Diagram
![Is the sac suppose to be empty? This isn't a hate post, I just have never had a scan before 6 weeks of pregnancy so I'm not sure what it's suppose to Is the sac suppose to be empty? This isn't a hate post, I just have never had a scan before 6 weeks of pregnancy so I'm not sure what it's suppose to](https://i.redd.it/86m6r494wk4a1.jpg)